TOURIST SATISFACTION DURING THE PANDEMIC: AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF MEASURES TO PREVENT COVID-19 IN A MEDITERRANEAN COASTAL DESTINATION

The impact of the COVID-19 on tourist satisfaction is a particular relevant issue, due to the role that elements such as the prevention measures implemented at the destination might play. For this reason, this article examines tourist satisfaction during the peak tourist season of 2020 in a mature coastal destination in Catalonia in relation to safety and prevention measures imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We use explanatory factor analysis and partial least squares path modelling for comparing the determinants of tourist satisfaction prior and during the pandemic based on surveys conducted in 2019 (N = 1556) and 2020 (N = 2220). The results suggest that the determinants of overall tourist satisfaction in 2019 remained significant in 2020. Moreover, although tourists especially appreciated feeling safe in 2020, our results suggest that such a perception was unrelated to measures to prevent COVID-19. The paper raises concerns towards the management of situations such as the pandemic in tourist destinations, as a proper balance must be found between the need of making visitors feel safe, and avoiding measures that can be felt as invasive or annoying, hampering the tourist experience.

FEDERAL DETENTION AND "WILD FACTS" DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Whether to detain or release a defendant in a federal criminal case can be among the most challenging decisions federal judges face. Detention hearings present courts with a wide variety of factual circumstances surrounding defendants and their personal histories, their charged offenses, the evidence against them, the ways in which their detention or release might bear upon the community's safety, and the likelihood that they will appear in court. At least that much is the black letter law. But as the novel coronavirus known as SARS-CoV-2 raced through the US in the winter and spring of 2020, touching off widespread infections of the disease labeled COVID-19, a new challenge arose with respect to federal arrestees and defendants already in detention. Citing the threat of COVID-19 infection, many defense attorneys began aggressively pushing for release of their clients. Here, Fuentes offers a framework for considering defendants' arguments for release based on the COVID-19 pandemic.

Herpes Zoster Duplex Unilateralis as a manifestation of severe lymphopenia in COVID-19

SARS-CoV2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2), a novel coronavirus was first reported in December of 2019 from Wuhan, China as an aetiological agent causing a new infectious respiratory disease (coronavirus disease 2019- COVID-19). The main clinical manifestations of COVID-19 are fever, cough, fatigue, dyspnoea and muscle aches. Herpes zoster is characterized by several groups of painful vesicles on an erythematous base with a distribution in a unilateral dermatome involving the skin and/or mucosa. Herpes zoster is caused by varicella zoster virus which remains dormant in the sensory root ganglion contained by the immune system particularly CD lymphocytes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Clinical features of 153 patients with COVID-19 in Chongqing municipality.

Objective: To analyze the clinical features of patients with COVID-19 in Chongqing Municipality. Method(s): The clinical data, laboratory tests and chest imaging findings of 153 patients COVID-19 admitted in Chongqing Public Health Medical Center from January 26 to February 5, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. According to the relevant diagnostic criteria, patients were divided into non-severe group (n=132) and severe group (n=21). The correlation between serum index changes and disease severity was analyzed. Result(s): The proportion of patients with underlying diabetes or chronic respiratory diseases in severe group was significantly higher than that in non-severe group (chi2=11.04 and 6.94, P<0.05). The proportion of symptom-free patients in non-severe group was significantly higher than that in severe group (chi2=4.09, P<0.05). The symptoms of fever, fatigue and muscle soreness in the severe group were more common than those in the non-severe group (chi2=4.40, 14.42 and 22.67, P<0.05). Among the concomitant symptoms, the proportion of cough and shortness of breath in the severe group was higher than that in the non-severe group (chi2=8.46 and 4.80, P<0.05). C-reactive protein and D-Dimer levels were higher in the severe group than those in the non-severe group (Z=-4.39 and -1.96, P<0.05), and the number of CD3+ T lymphocyte cells, CD4+ T lymphocyte cells and CD8+ T lymphocyte cells in the severe group was lower than that in the non-severe group (Z=27.25, 20.60 and 17.36, P<0.05). Compared with the non-severe group, both lungs and the right lung lower lobe were more susceptible to be involved(chi2=9.7123.61, P<0.05). Conclusion(s): There are significant differences in underlying diseases, clinical symptoms, imaging manifestations and laboratory findings between severe and non-severe patients with COVID-19.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.

COVID-19 infection and ginseng: Predictive influenza virus strains and non-predictive COVID-19 vaccine strains.

Vaccines help protect people from infections. However, Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinees often still become infected with COVID-19 variants (breakthrough infections) and may go on to suffer from long COVID symptoms due to short-lasting immunity and less-effective protection provided by available vaccines. Moreover, the current COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent viral transmission and ward off only about 15% of breakthrough infections. To prepare more effective vaccines, it is essential to predict the viral strains that will be circulating based on available epidemiological data. The World Health Organization recommends in advance which influenza strains are expected to be prevalent during influenza season to guide the production of influenza vaccines by pharmaceutical companies. However, future emerging COVID-19 strain(s) have not been possible to predict since no sound epidemiological information has been established. Thus, for more effective protection, immune stimulators alone or in combination with vaccines would be preferable to protect people from COVID-19 infection. One of those remedies would be ginseng, which has been used for potentiating immunity in the past.

[Pulmonary rehabilitation, return home: the issues of psychic care for severe Covid-19 patients]. / Réadaptation pulmonaire, retour au domicile : les enjeux du soin psychique des patients Covid-19 sévère.

Upon discharge from the ICU, most severe post-Covid-19 patients are considered out of danger and on the mend. A large proportion of these patients are able to go home, but some continue to be frail and suffer from the side effects of the disease and the past heavy hospitalization. Others do not have the necessary support at home. Pulmonary rehabilitation is becoming a critical step in prognosis and a comfortable return home. It allows many patients to regain confidence in their body and its potential, to bridge the gap between a medically safe passive position and daily life, which should become as independent as possible, and to optimally reduce the risks of regression or relapse.

The Incidence and Severity of COVID-19 in the Liverpool Severe Asthma Population Undergoing Biologic Therapy.

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection can have a variable impact on patients. Various host factors have been identified that play a significant role in the risk of COVID-19 infection and its severity. Patients with severe asthma have been clinically vulnerable since the first wave of the pandemic and the resurgence of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom in January 2020. In addition, those on treatment with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been identified as being vulnerable to COVID-19 infection and severity by the World Health Organization and the Department of Health. However, the evidence to support this notion is limited, and there has been contrary evidence to suggest severe asthma is protective against COVID-19. In this study, a retrospective review of severe asthma patients in the Liverpool population between 1st January 2020 and 31st January 2021 was conducted. This study aimed to determine the association between asthma severity and the risk of COVID-19 infection and/or its severity for patients on mAb treatment. Methodology We conducted a review of all patients from the Liverpool severe asthma database/spreadsheet who tested positive in the community and at the hospital. Admission records, primary records, emails, and microbiological data for Anglia ICE were reviewed at the Royal Liverpool and Aintree University Hospital. A COVID-19 diagnosis was predefined as a positive lateral flow test and a positive polymerase chain reaction test. The proportion of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and severe COVID-19 disease requiring hospital admission and escalation to intensive care (observation, intubation, continuous positive airway pressure) was noted. Other patient characteristics were recorded including age, weight, body mass index (BMI), gender, smoking status (never, former, current smoker), bronchiectasis, and the forced expiratory volume. Results In total, 760 patients were identified to have severe asthma, of whom 59 (7.8%) tested positive for COVID-19 and 701 (92.2%) tested negative. A total of 244 (32%) patients were taking mAbs, and 516 (68%) were not on mAb treatment. Patients were more susceptible to COVID-19 on an mAb (13.5%) versus non-mAb (5%) (odds ratio (OR) = 2.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.72 to 5.05) . A larger proportion of severe asthma patients on mAb treatment testing positive for COVID-19 were current smokers and had a higher BMI. Furthermore, severe asthmatics taking mAbs did not have a higher risk of severe COVID-19 disease, hospitalisation, and intensive care admission. Conclusions In the Liverpool severe asthma population, patients undergoing mAb therapy had a higher incidence of COVID-19 compared to non-mAb groups; however, they were not at a higher risk of severe disease progression. These findings suggest that continuing biologic therapy in severe asthmatics with COVID-19 appears to be safe to prevent exacerbations.

[Psychological state of Covid-19 patients after resuscitation]. / État psychologique des patients Covid-19 après réanimation.

The epidemic of Covid-19 was characterized, from its beginning, by "emergency". A state of emergency enacted by the state authorities to fight, on one hand, against the pandemic as such and, on the other hand, to manage the influx of patients admitted in intensive care. In this unprecedented context, the suffering of the people goes beyond the emergency situation and persists in forms ranging from a pseudo-banality to the complexity of an insidious evolution.

Impact of Tocilizumab on Inflammatory Markers and Oxygen Status in Severe COVID-19 Patients: A Single Centre Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aims to investigate the impact of tocilizumab on inflammatory markers in patients with severe COVID-19. The effect on oxygenation was also assessed. METHODS: This study is a single-centre, retrospective cohort study conducted at NIMS hospital. Data of the eligible patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia who received injection tocilizumab (max 800 mg) were charted and analysed. Oxygenation and inflammatory markers were compared before and after (day 3 and day 7) tocilizumab injection. Effect of dysglycemia on the efficacy of tocilizumab was assessed. Outcomes were analysed in the form of discharge without oxygen, discharge with oxygen, and death. Data were analysed by SPSS v22. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 57.8 ± 12.2 years, and 78.57% were male. Forty-four percent of the patient had type 2 diabetes. Tocilizumab treatment was associated with reduction in the oxygen requirement [median:10 L/min (IQR6- 14)] v/s 4 L/min (IQR 3-7, p-0.005]. Peripheral oxygen saturation also improved after tocilizumab [92 % (IQR 90-96)] v/s [95 % (IQR 94-96), p-0.01)], respectively. Serum CRP level decreased significantly when evaluated after three days (44±5 v/s 20 ±3 mg/dl, p=< 0.001). Out of the 42, 12 (29%) patients died due to severe COVID-19 or its complications. When compared with the patients who survived, patients who died had a higher level of D-dimer (1.2 ± 0.51 v/s 3.1 ±1.2 ng/dl, p-value- 0.04), and LDH: (845 ±55 v/s 1364 ±198 U/L, p - 0.01). At day seven of the tocilizumab injection, diabetic patients (n-13) had higher IL-6 serum level than nondiabetic patients (n-16) [(median- 311(IQR-1245.5) v/s (209 (IQR-546.2), p-value- 0.048]. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective pre-post analysis, tocilizumab injection was associated with reduced inflammation and improved oxygenation in severe COVID-19. Despite high IL-6 levels, diabetes had no impact on the efficacy of the tocilizumab.

Long-Term Follow-Up of a Severe Eosinophilic Asthmatic Patient With Comorbid Nasal Polyposis Hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 Infection While Receiving Benralizumab: A Case Report.

We report a case of a patient affected by severe eosinophilic asthma with nasal polyps (SEA+NP) who developed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) six months after starting benralizumab as add-on therapy. Both SEA and NP were under control with no exacerbations at the time of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The patient was hospitalized for four months, during which the treatment with benralizumab was interrupted. Despite the onset of bilateral interstitial pneumonia, developed as a consequence of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, the patient was discharged without complications, with a significant improvement in the chest CT scan following the administration of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) and low-flow oxygen therapy. The treatment with benralizumab was reintroduced at the regular dosing regimen immediately after his discharge. Lung function was assessed three months after the discharge and showed normal levels as before the development of COVID-19 symptoms. A long-term follow-up after 26 months from the introduction of benralizumab showed a normal lung function and well-controlled asthma, without exacerbations or the need for corticosteroid bursts.

SARS-COV-2 vaccine acceptance in patients with rheumatic diseases: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine acceptance among patients with rheumatic diseases (RMD). METHODS: All rheumatology patients attending a large suburban health network were invited to participate in an anonymized online survey. The primary outcome of interest was SARS-COV-2 vaccine acceptance. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of respondents (n = 641) was 52.7 (15.1) years and 74.4% (n = 474) were female. Sixty-five percent were willing to have a SARS-COV-2 vaccine, while 34.4% were vaccine-hesitant (unwilling or undecided). On multivariate analysis, vaccine acceptance was associated with smoking (OR: 2.25 [95% CI: 1.22-4.15; p = .009]), history of malignancy (OR: 2.51 [95% CI: 1.19-5.26; p = .015]), influenza or pneumococcal vaccination in the preceding year (OR: 2.69 [95% CI: 1.78-4.05; p < .001]) and number of COVID-Safe measures practiced (OR: 1.54 [95% CI: 1.05-2.26; p = .027]). Vaccine acceptance correlated with positive beliefs regarding vaccine efficacy (r = 0.40; p < .001) and safety (r = 0.36; p < .001). Vaccine acceptance correlated negatively with concerns regarding side-effects (r = -0.30; p < .001) and vaccine-associated RMD flare (r = -0.21; p < .001). In vaccine-hesitant respondents, 39.2% were more likely to accept vaccination if given a choice of which vaccine they receive and 54.5% if their rheumatologist recommended it. Twenty-seven percent of patients on immunomodulators were willing to withhold medications while 42.1% were willing if advised by their rheumatologist. CONCLUSION: SARS-COV-2 vaccine hesitancy is prevalent amongst RMD patients and associated with concerns regarding vaccine safety, efficacy, side effects and RMD flare. Clinician recommendation, vaccine choice and communications targeting patient concerns could facilitate vaccine acceptance.Significance and Innovations Vaccine hesitancy is prevalent in RMD patientsVaccine acceptance is associated with beliefs regarding vaccine safety and efficacy and concerns regarding RMD flare and vaccine-associated side effectsVaccine choice and clinician recommendation have the potential to improve vaccine acceptance in patients who are hesitant.

Should people with severe mental illness be prioritized for the COVID-19 vaccination?

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) has spread throughout the world, affecting many vulnerable populations including patients with severe mental illness (SMI). Recent studies have found that patients with SMI compared to the general population could have a greater risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 due to cognitive impairment, poor awareness of risk, and difficulties in complying with infection control measures. Although some researchers have suggested that patients with SMI should be prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination to reduce the risk of infection, this issue remains controversial.

Interferon-α2b spray inhalation did not shorten virus shedding time of SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients: a preliminary matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no drugs that have been proven to be effective against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Because of its broad antiviral activity, interferon (IFN) should be evaluated as a potential therapeutic agent for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially while COVID-19-specific therapies are still under development. METHODS: Confirmed COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University in Hangzhou, China, from January 19 to February 19, 2020 were enrolled in a retrospective study. The patients were separated into an IFN group and a control group according to whether they received initial IFN-α2b inhalation treatment after admission. Propensity-score matching was used to balance the confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 104 confirmed COVID-19 patients, 68 in the IFN group and 36 in the control group, were enrolled. Less hypertension (27.9% vs. 55.6%, P=0.006), dyspnea (8.8% vs. 25.0%, P=0.025), or diarrhea (4.4% vs. 19.4%, P=0.030) was observed in the IFN group. Lower levels of albumin and C-reactive protein and higher level of sodium were observed in the IFN group. Glucocorticoid dosage was lower in the IFN group (median, 40 vs. 80 mg/d, P=0.025). Compared to the control group, fewer patients in the IFN group were ventilated (13.2% vs. 33.3%, P=0.015) and admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) (16.2% vs. 44.4%, P=0.002). There were also fewer critical patients in the IFN group (7.4% vs. 25.0%, P=0.017) upon admission. Although complications during admission process were comparable between groups, the discharge rate (85.3% vs. 66.7%, P=0.027) was higher and the hospitalization time (16 vs. 21 d, P=0.015) was shorter in the IFN group. When other confounding factors were not considered, virus shedding time (10 vs. 13 d, P=0.014) was also shorter in the IFN group. However, when the influence of other factors was eliminated using propensity score matching, virus shedding time was not significantly shorter than that of the control group (12 vs. 15 d, P=0.206). CONCLUSIONS: IFN-α2b spray inhalation did not shorten virus shedding time of SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients.

Convalescent Plasma Coupled With Medications for the Treatment of a Severe COVID-19 Patient: Drugs Analysis and Pharmaceutical Care Based on the Newly Established Guidelines for COVID-19 Remedy.

Given the extreme importance of the current pandemic caused by COVID-19 and due to the fact that scientists agree that there is no identified treatment, this paper analyzes in detail the treatment of a severe COVID-19 patient with convalescent plasma and drugs based on current guidelines for COVID-19 diagnosis and treatment. This can provide a reference for other medical institutions on rational drug use and pharmaceutical care for severe COVID-19 patients.

Erratum to: Transmission risk of patients with COVID-19 meeting discharge criteria should be interpreted with caution.

Erratum to: J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol) 2020 21(5):408-410. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B2000117. The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. For Fig. 1a in p.409, the citation of a reference, as well as the permission to reprint this picture, was missing. The correct version and the corresponding reference are given below: (a) Chest computed tomography (CT) image of Patient 1 on admission presents multiple ground-glass opacities distributed in the periphery of inferior lobe of both lungs. Reprinted from Zhang et al. (2020), with kind permission from Springer Nature.